The Rigger Depot
​
  • AAF
    • AN-6513 Harness >
      • AN6513-1 Pack
      • AN6513-1A Pack
    • A-3 Harness >
      • A-3 Chest Pack
    • Observer Harness
    • A-4 Harness >
      • A-4 Chest Pack
    • B-7 Back Type
    • B-8 Back Type
    • Seat Packs
  • British
    • Observer Harness
    • Observer Pack
    • RAF Seat Harness
    • RAF First Aid Packet
    • Dinghy/Raft Cases
    • Type X Mk1
    • Type X Mk2
    • Type-X Camouflage
    • SOE Type X
    • Jedburgh Type X
  • Troop Chutes
    • T-4 Assembly
    • Troop Reserves >
      • 41K Reserve (training)
      • 43H Reserve (Normandy)
      • 44J Reserve (Varsity)
      • Economy Reserve
    • T-5 Training
    • T-5 Normandy
    • T-5 Market Garden
    • T-5 Varsity
    • X-5 Modification Kit
    • T-7 Assemblies
    • T-5 FSSF
  • Airborne
    • Parachute First Aid
    • Escape & Evasion Kit
    • Airborne Kit Bag
    • BC-611 Harness
    • 5-hole Chinstrap
    • G-1 Cargo Pack
    • Griswold Bag
    • 517th Chincup
  • Navy
    • Navy Seat Harness
    • Navy QAS Harness
    • QAS Pack Tray
    • AN-6513 Harness
    • Navy Chest Pack
    • Paramarine Chutes
  • Flight Gear
    • Flak Vest
    • Aviator Kit Bag
    • Escape & Evasion Kit
    • E&E Contents
    • First Aid Packet (Zippered)
    • Parachute First Aid Packet (2nd Version)
    • RAF First Aid Packet
    • A-3 Gunners Strap
    • Headset Ear Cushions
  • Parts
    • Bungees
    • Canopies & Fillers
    • Back pads/Cushions
    • Log Records
    • T-5/7 Pullout Panel
    • Harness Tacking Kit
    • T-5 Pack Lacing
    • Repair/Repack
    • Other
  • Reference
    • "What They Wore"
    • QAC Color Coding
    • Why So Many Seat Parachutes?
    • Bailout Stats
    • Static Line Hooks
    • Quick Release T-5
    • T-7 & T-10 Transition
    • Pack Bungees
    • Camo Parachutes
  • Info
    • Ordering
    • Contact
    • Repair/Repack
    • Aging Services
    • About
    • Identifying Marks
  • Film
Picture
PictureTesting of block pattern, 1942
Parachutes were traditionally constructed with undyed materials for fear that various additives would weaken the fabric. However, the question of camouflaged parachutes was sparked in 1942 when it was learned that the enemy targeted pilots vulnerably suspended in their parachutes after bailing out. The idea was that a camouflaged parachute would delay perception from higher altitude enemy aircraft looking earthward. A similar question had been posed by the Airborne Command for paratroop equipment and an investigation was commenced.

 Testing indicated that when viewed from the ground, no type of camouflage could mask the descending parachutes. However, when viewed from above, a printed foliage pattern both bended into the landscape below and provided enhanced protection from enemy ground forces in the vicinity. 

 Ultimately four styles of camouflaged canopies were tested; a solid olive drab color, a solid sand shade, a block pattern, and a foliage pattern.  Although AAF policy for escape parachutes remained 100% white, the Airborne Command indicated in November 1942 its desire to procure parachutes on a basis of 50% white, 50% camouflage pending further tests. 

 Later in November, forty-five parachutes in the foliage pattern were sent to Fort Bragg to “determine the tactical utility of camouflaged troop type parachutes under mass jumping conditions.” The foliage pattern bested the block pattern, which incorporated large angular sections in green, black, and light olive drab. On March 12, 1943, the foliage pattern was declared superior and standardized for procurement to replace all white assemblies.


Picture
 

​The foliage pattern was composed of dark green and olive colored shapes arrayed on a khaki backdrop. The short-lived original pattern was composed of irregular shapes in a pattern repeating approximately every 18 inches along the length of the material. In late 1943, a simplified pattern based on the standard five-color camouflage printed Army/Marine HBT pattern was adopted. The brown splotches were switched to dark green, and the light brown, olive, and green splotches were all combined into a mid-olive green shade. 
​
Picture


Left: HBT Camo
Right: Parachute Camo 


Note: The dark brown of the HBT pattern corresponds to the dark green of the parachute camouflage.

The other shades of the HBT pattern are lumped together to form the mid-OD shapes on the parachute pattern.

The camouflage pattern soldiered on for nearly a decade until it was phased out during the Korean War. At that time, the general trend was away from specialized camouflage patterns and towards a solid OD color applied to all equipment. This would save approximately $4 per parachute canopy. The utility of such a pattern also came into question. The primary benefit of the foliage pattern over a solid OD pattern was in the bushy or forested terrain specifically avoided for parachute drop zones. Furthermore, colorful cargo parachutes accompanying the troops clearly demarcated the DZ regardless of the camouflaged personnel chutes. Approval for the terminating the foliage pattern was granted in October 1952, although camouflage canopies were still being produced as late as 1954 in a ripstop pattern.

Is My Piece of Camo From WWII?
Today, many of the "WWII camo parachute scarves" sold online  are in reality cut from postwar camouflage cargo parachutes. Cut through the marketing and ask yourself these 4 killer questions:
  1. ​Is this 1st or 2nd pattern print? If the camo print is the first pattern, it is certainly wartime. However, the second pattern could be either WWII or postwar.​
  2. Is the material ripstop? If the weave has small boxes/squares, it is definitely postwar.
  3. What color is the stitching? Most WWII canopies will be sewn with khaki or OD thread, while postwar canopies tend to be assembled with white thread.  
  4. What is the geometry of the panels? The accompanying diagram illustrates a surefire method to identify if it comes from the postwar 64' or 100' cargo canopies. ​Sections from cargo chutes will have different panel geometry that is readily identified with a bit of practice.
Picture
All parachute systems and related components manufactured by The Rigger Depot are strictly for display. The manufacturer does not accept any liability in any way, shape, or form. All text & images Copyright 2021